Convivencia
coexistence; living together across difference
Resilience Mechanism
Resilient coexistence does not arise from natural harmony. It depends on rights, rules and institutions that enable people with different identities, views and historical memories to remain within a shared civic space even during serious disagreement.
What It Means
In this context, Convivencia literally means “living together” or “coexistence”. In Spanish usage, the concept has two connected meanings. The first belongs to historical debates about relations among Christian, Muslim and Jewish communities in medieval Iberia. The second belongs to contemporary democratic language about shared life in a society divided by religion, language, origin, regional identity and political outlook.
For resilience, its significance lies not in the promise of conflict-free coexistence, but in the capacity to preserve common rules and spaces of interaction when difference creates tension.
How It Works in a Crisis
During political polarisation, migration-related tension or conflict over memory, religion and regional identity, convivencia is sustained through concrete civic mechanisms.
Laws protect equal rights, schools establish shared rules, municipal services maintain equal access, and mediation helps address disputes before they become exclusion or violence. The mechanism is not the removal of disagreement. It is the ability to keep disagreement within a common democratic framework in which people may remain in conflict without denying one another’s right to belong.
-
What happens
Polarisation and conflict between groups
-
What we focus on
Equal rights and shared democratic rules
-
How we act
Mediation, access and rules for coexistence
-
What it gives
Disagreement without exclusion or violence
A Lesson for Other Countries
The Spanish experience shows that a plural society does not become resilient simply by asking people to be tolerant.
Coexistence requires institutions, procedures and everyday practices that protect equal rights, provide channels for disagreement and prevent majorities from pushing minorities out of shared civic life. Differences do not have to disappear.
The task of a resilient society is to ensure that they do not destroy the possibility of living, learning, working and making decisions together. Coexistence must be organised, protected and repeatedly repaired.
Coexistence must be organised, protected and repeatedly repaired.
Where It Comes From
The concept entered modern historical debate through the work of Spanish scholar Américo Castro, who lived in exile after the Spanish Civil War. He used convivencia to interpret the complex relations among Christian, Muslim and Jewish communities in medieval Iberia. The term later became the subject of sustained scholarly debate.
Some researchers used it to describe cultural interaction, while others warned that it could obscure hierarchy, persecution and violence. After Spain’s transition to democracy beginning in 1975, convivencia also became part of public language in education, municipal government, integration and anti-discrimination policy.
What It Looks Like Today
In contemporary Spain, convivencia is present in the language of schools, municipalities, citizenship, integration and anti-discrimination. Examples include school convivencia work, responses to racism and xenophobia, mediation and policies that protect equal participation in a plural society.
The contemporary framework includes not only anti-racism but also policies against discrimination towards LGBTQ+ people. Convivencia should therefore be presented as a broader civic and anti-discrimination framework, not only as an interreligious or migration-related concept.
Limits of the Concept
Convivencia should not be romanticised as a harmonious “golden age of three cultures” or presented as evidence of Spanish society’s natural tolerance.
Medieval Iberia was a space of cultural interaction, but also of hierarchy, coercion, persecution, expulsions and violence. The concept should therefore retain its critical complexity and should not be used to obscure contemporary racism, xenophobia, discrimination or social inequality. Coexistence has meaning only when it includes recognition of conflict, protection of rights and accountability for discrimination and exclusion.
Dictionary Links
Related Terms
-
convivencia escolar
-
coexistence
-
living together
-
pluralism
-
citizenship
-
inclusion
Sources
Useful Links
- Eduardo Manzano Moreno, "Qurtuba: Some Critical Considerations of the Caliphate of Cordoba and the Myth of Convivencia", in *Reflections on Qurtuba in the 21st Century*, 2013
- Jorge Elices Ocon and Eduardo Manzano Moreno, "Uses of the Past in Early Medieval Iberia (Eighth-Tenth Centuries)", *Medieval Worlds* 10 (2019)
- Christophe Cailleaux, "Chretiens, juifs et musulmans dans l'Espagne medievale. La convivencia et autres mythes historiographiques", *Cahiers de la Mediterranee* 86 (2013)
- Anna Akasoy, "Convivencia and its discontents: Interfaith life in Al-Andalus", *International Journal of Middle East Studies* 42, no. 3 (2010)
- Ministerio de Educacion, Formacion Profesional y Deportes, Observatorio Estatal de la Convivencia Escolar
- Ministerio de Inclusion, Seguridad Social y Migraciones / OBERAXE, *Marco Estrategico de Ciudadania e Inclusion contra el Racismo y la Xenofobia, 2023-2027*
Stay Together
Other Terms in This Dimension
-
Arevut hadadit
Israel
-
Ayni
Peru
-
Bayanihan
Philippines
-
Besa
Albania
-
Candombe
Uruguay
-
Dugnad
Norway
-
Guancasco
Honduras
-
Harambee
Kenya
-
İmece
Türkiye
-
Jeong
Republic of Korea
-
Kampung spirit
Singapore
-
Mateship
Australia
-
Meitheal
Ireland
-
Samfundssind
Denmark
-
Slava
Serbia
-
Tereré / Pohã ñana
Paraguay
-
Ubuntu
South Africa