Jeong
정an affective social bond formed over time through care and shared experience
Resilience Mechanism
Relationships built long before a crisis can become sources of support during hardship. Accumulated trust, attachment and mutual attentiveness help people recognise one another’s needs and respond even before help is explicitly requested.
What It Means
In this context, Jeong is a Korean concept describing an attachment that gradually develops through time spent together, repeated care, familiarity and shared experience. It is not limited to intense affection between close family members. Jeong may grow between relatives, neighbours, friends, classmates, colleagues or members of a community.
For resilience, its importance lies in the sense of belonging and responsibility that such relationships can create. People know more about one another’s circumstances, notice difficulties earlier and may be more willing to offer practical or emotional support.
How It Works in a Crisis
During hardship, relationships shaped by jeong can mobilise support quickly.
Relatives, neighbours, friends, colleagues or community members may share information, food or money, provide transport, childcare, temporary shelter or workplace flexibility, or simply offer reassurance and presence. Support may arrive before a clear request is made. People respond because they understand one another’s circumstances, notice changes and feel that an established relationship carries care and responsibility. In this way, an everyday social bond becomes a practical support network.
-
What happens
Difficult conditions require rapid support
-
What we focus on
Long relationships and knowledge of one another
-
How we act
Help often begins before a direct request
-
What it gives
Social connection becomes a support network
A Lesson for Other Countries
The Korean experience shows that social resilience is built not only through emergency plans, formal services and rapid mobilisation.
Its foundation is also created in ordinary times through repeated care, trusted relationships, familiarity with other people’s needs and everyday mutual attentiveness. These relationships do not replace institutions, but can help identify problems earlier, support people while formal assistance is being organised and enable communities to act alongside public and civil-society services.
Preparing for crisis therefore includes maintaining open and dependable social ties, not only procedures and material resources.
Preparing for crisis therefore includes maintaining open and dependable social ties, not only procedures and material resources.
Where It Comes From
Jeong is deeply embedded in Korean social and cultural life. It is associated with woori, a sense of “we-ness” that develops through sustained belonging to a family, neighbourhood, school, university, workplace or other community. Industrialisation and rapid urban growth did not create jeong, but changed the settings in which it developed.
Alongside family and local community ties, workplace, educational, religious and professional networks became increasingly important. The concept therefore remained relevant while adapting to new forms of social life.
What It Looks Like Today
Today, jeong develops through long-term relationships in families, neighbourhoods, schools, universities, workplaces, religious groups and professional communities. It appears not in a one-off gesture but in repeated attention: remembering another person’s needs, staying in contact, sharing time and accepting mutual responsibility.
Jeong is not a government programme or automatically positive closeness. The same ties can create excessive expectations, closed circles of insiders or unequal access to opportunity. Its resilience value emerges when care supports a person without removing boundaries, freedom or the right to refuse.
Limits of the Concept
Jeong should not be presented as mysterious Korean warmth or as an entirely positive cultural quality.
Close relationships can create pressure, burdensome obligations, emotional labour, unspoken expectations and difficulty refusing requests. Support may also remain confined to insiders. When jeong reinforces yongo networks based on family, education, regional background or workplace affiliation, access to help and opportunity may depend on group membership. Mutual loyalty can then become favouritism, unequal access and the exclusion of people outside the network.
Dictionary Links
Related Terms
-
jeong ( / )
-
woori ()
shared sense of "we-ness"
-
yongo / yongo-gwan'gye ( / )
affiliation-based ties
-
hakyon ()
alumni-based ties
-
hyulyon ()
blood / family ties
-
jiyon ()
regional-origin ties
Sources
Useful Links
- Park, I. (2022). "Korean Social Emotions: Han, Heung, and Jeong." In *Emotions in Korean Philosophy and Religion*. Springer
- Chung, C. K. and Cho, S. J. (2006). "Conceptualization of Jeong and Dynamics of Hwabyung." *Psychiatry Investigation*, 3(1), 46-54
- Yang, I. and Horak, S. (2019). "Emotions, indigenous affective ties, and social network theory: The case of South Korea." *Asia Pacific Journal of Management*, 36, 395-414
- Taylor, S. E.; Welch, W. T.; Kim, H. S.; and Sherman, D. K. (2007). "Cultural Differences in the Impact of Social Support on Psychological and Biological Stress Responses." *Psychological Science*, 18(9), 831-837
-
Kim, H. S.; Sherman, D. K.; and Taylor, S. E. (2008). "Culture and Social Support." *American Psychologist*, 63(6), 518-526.
-
Yee, J. (2015). "Social Capital in Korea: relational capital, trust, and transparency." *International Journal of Japanese Sociology*, 24(1), 30-47.
Stay Together
Other Terms in This Dimension
-
Arevut hadadit
Israel
-
Ayni
Peru
-
Bayanihan
Philippines
-
Besa
Albania
-
Candombe
Uruguay
-
Convivencia
Spain
-
Dugnad
Norway
-
Guancasco
Honduras
-
Harambee
Kenya
-
İmece
Türkiye
-
Kampung spirit
Singapore
-
Mateship
Australia
-
Meitheal
Ireland
-
Samfundssind
Denmark
-
Slava
Serbia
-
Tereré / Pohã ñana
Paraguay
-
Ubuntu
South Africa